Epicurean vs stoic moral theory

This fact can only be understood as a result of one of those encounters which occurs between radically opposed perspectives, and one of those fundamental equivocations in which history delights.


A basic understanding of Stoicism can be understood through the following points from the notes by Professor Freeland: Though these and other developments in logic are interesting in their own right, the Stoic treatment of certain problems about modality and bivalence are more significant for the shape of Stoicism as a whole.

This is not to say that the Roman Stoics retreat from the earlier Stoic materialism. Ethics itself is in reality something humbly human, laborious, patient, prudent, which carries the golden rule of reason into the midst of human relativities, and weighs great and little actions in the scales of a diamond-cutter.

Courage is subdivided into endurance, confidence, high-mindedness, cheerfulness, and industriousness. For a more general treatment covering Stoic philosophy as a whole, see Sellars The further identification of God with pneuma or breath may have its origins in medical theories of the Hellenistic period.

However, paradoxically, it also seems like anyone sincerely embracing Epicureanism would be better off to teach Stoicism to others, and the doctrine of natural affection toward mankind, because that would ultimately be more in their self-interest.

The first is caused by a fireplace, while the second is caused by some other means. Other Roman Stoics whose works have not been so well preserved include Musonius Rufus c.

There is no mean between virtue and vice. Thus, only bodies exist. From all of this we gain the understanding that everything is made of atoms, that the arrangement of atoms affects the state of human beings, and that it is through the ensouled body with the capacity of sensation that we are able to gain knowledge of the world.

This thought leads me to question why the Epicurean does not fear death. In the so-called Master Argument, he attempted to show that these two theses were incompatible with the claim that 3 there is something which is possible, but yet does not happen.

With respect to the second point, the Stoic sage will never find herself in a situation where she acts contrary to what Kant calls inclination or desire. But since we possess reason in common with all or nearly all human beings, we identify ourselves not only with our own immediate family, but with all members of the human race—they are all fellow members of our broader rational community.

Rather, we have the potential to increase our sensitivity to cognitive impressions when they are present. The most important figure in the Neo-Stoic movement was Justus Lipsius — The first is caused by a fireplace, while the second is caused by some other means.

The supreme End and the sovereign Good must be within the grasp of every individual, if only he is sufficiently determined and if he listens to the new doctors.

Let us say that it was under the protective covering of the juridical idea of jus gentium that the philosophical idea of natural law succeeded in imposing itself explicitly on the common consciousness: Finally, the Stoics had as an ethical ideal that people should love all the inhabitants of the world in the same way that they loved themselves.

Epicureanism vs. stoicism Essay

So where does this leave the matter. We can distinguish two specific tactics for denying this. It connotes a kind of complete self-sufficiency. The Stoics felt that passions, fears, desires, and pleasure were irrational; so they tried to avoid them and live life in complete apathy to these issues.

Auswahl der Fragmente und Zeugnisse. With whom, then, ought we to maintain it. The Inwood and Gerson collection translates many of the same texts, but unlike LS does not chop them up into smaller bits classified by topic.

These arise in relation to what appears to us to be good or bad. Anything that she conditionally prefers is always subordinate to her conception of the genuine good. It is no part of their thesis that just anyone can distinguish between cognitive and incognitive impressions. The Skeptic Carneades addressed a crowd of thousands on one day and argued that justice was a genuine good in its own right.

Distress and pleasure pertain to present objects, fear and appetite to future objects. You'll receive weekly emails with my commentary on passages from Epictetus. So, on one early externalist theory of knowledge, it was suggested that an agent might know a certain sort of proposition e.

The principle of adiaphora was also common to the Cynics. This idea of world-cycles punctuated by conflagrations raised a number of questions.

A fine overview that argues that Zeno founder of the Stoa systematized the Socratic and Cynic philosophies. The event of Seneca sitting in a bathtub contemplating a book involves such objects as Seneca, his book and his tub, but it involves them in a way that has a kind of structure.

Epicureanism is a system of philosophy based upon the teachings of the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus, founded around BC. Epicurus was an atomic materialist, following in the steps of Democritus. A daring exposition of what Stoic philosophy would look like today if it had enjoyed a continuous development through the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, modern science, and the fads of twentieth century moral philosophy.

Ancient Ethical Theory

Stoic v. Epicurean: The Battle of Moral Theories Peter Calhoun The Coolest Cutter At Camp After critically analyzing both Stoic and Epicurean moral theories, I found myself intrigued by their different beliefs. Some writers, such as Annas (), suppose that Stoic moral philosophy largely floats free of Stoic metaphysics, and especially from Stoic theology.

Other writers, such as Cooper (, and ), suppose that Stoic moral philosophy is intimately intertwined with Stoic metaphysics. Stoic izu-onsen-shoheiso.comean: The Battle of Moral Theories Peter Calhoun The Coolest Cutter At Camp After critically analyzing both Stoic and Epicurean moral theories, I found myself intrigued by their different beliefs.I was fascinated by the Epicurean pleasure filled and painless seeking lifestyle.

I was also enticed by the teleological beliefs of the Stoics. Essay on Epicurean vs Stoic Moral Theory Epicureanism moral theory is based upon achieving a life where pleasure is considered the greatest good.

Pleasure is sought after and achieved through the removal of physical pain and mental worries.

Epicurean vs stoic moral theory
Rated 5/5 based on 23 review
Moral Philosophy 4